In everything we do, we believe in inspiring others to learn. Imagine a science class where every student is engaged in hands-on science and motivated to discover the world around them. The way we inspire learning is to help teachers use inquiry-based instruction. We just happen to make great biology lesson plans!Free Biology Lessons
Imagine a class where students are engaged every second because they are curious. Student curiosity and inquiry brings out the desire to learn, to be challenged, and to persevere. You will be able to download all of our lesson plans for free or with a 2015-2016 membership, you can have the editable files too. Start downloading today.Sign In
Envision students wanting to learn again, excited to come to class because they know they will discover something new. Inquiry allows students to rediscover their love for learning. Students taking ownership of their learning is natural when they are motivated to learn, as inquiry is a great way to ignite their passions.Science Links
Dream of a day when every student is collaborating with their peers about something they are curious in. When students' curiosities are peaked, they will learn on their own, the teacher just scaffolds. How much, to whom? Students need to know enough to be curious but not more. Use students' prior knowledge to drive differentiation.Differentiate
Next Gen Science and the Common Core
The Common Core and NGSS are focused on "what needs to be taught", not how it is taught. Curriculum is one of the most important aspects of any class as it combines the what you teach with how you teach it. Lessons that integrate inquiry, prior knowledge, & various learning styles while capturing student curiosity, have the greatest impact on learning. The Next Gen standards incorporate three main ideas: 1) Science Practices, 2) Content Knowledge, 3) Integrate Concepts.
How you structure your curriculum is important to being successful with implementing the three main ideas of the NGSS along with the Common Core. Below is an example of using an experiment to help teach the standards.
Implementing NGSS with CCSS
- Question: Always start a lesson with a hook. A teacher demo, a story that creates tension, history of how the concept was discovered or a video from YouTube is great way to get students to become curious about what you are teaching. The goal of the hook is to get your students asking questions (what caused that, how did that happen).
- Analysis: Have students conduct a structured inquiry experiment to collect data. The data should be organized in a data table and graphed. The important aspect of this step is to have students analyze their data to find trends. While this may seem counter intuitive to have students immediately start with a higher DOK level, this requires students to apply their prior knowledge and analytical skills. Do not include lab questions or the lab background as the goal is to get students to analyze their data. Answering questions and being correct is not the goal at this point, data analysis is. Trial and error is a major component to the scientific method.  You may need to help students / groups with finding trends and relationships. Before finishing with data analysis, have students discuss their analysis in a small group and then as a class discussion. The teacher will collect the main ideas and maybe introduce new ones. Lastly, have all the students vote publicly on which ideas they think is correct.
- Vocabulary: Now is the time you introduce both academic and scientific vocabulary. Using a graphic organizer, students write the word, synonym of the word, definition of the word, and a sentence using the word. To speed up the process, provide students with this graphic organizer with the vocabulary word filled in, sentence frame for the how the word is used, and an image for the word.  This is a good spot to introduce the crosscutting concept to your students.
- Academic Speech: Students write how they talk. It is critical to have students practice saying complete sentences with the academic and content vocabulary. Students choral read the sentence with their partner. Then the teacher introduces new sentences that use the academic and scientific vocabulary and the class choral reads those sentences. While this takes valuable time, your students are building their academic oral language that will be used in their applied writing. 
- Content Instruction: The goal of this instruction is to guide students to discover separate pieces of information. Do not integrate the concepts for the students as they need to make these connections themselves later. You can guide students to collect the disintegrated facts through small group discussions based on prior knowledge, reading the textbook, or through teacher-led direct instruction. As a formative assessment, you may choose to use DOK 1 level multiple choice questions to check for their understanding.
- Concept Integration: Reintroduce to your students the crosscutting concept. Next, have students build a concept map of the main keywords and then have them cross-link the keywords using arrows.  On each arrow, students need to write words that explain how one keyword relates to the other keyword. Remember that we did not ask lab questions previously; this is the time to ask those types of questions. Students should have the concept map in front of them when they are writing the answers to the lab questions. Their answers need to include both academic and content vocabulary and be written in complete sentences. Do not provide students with a multiple choice style assessment as they need to synthesize the information themselves. The goal is to guide students to integrate the concepts taught with previous taught concepts and the crosscutting concept.
- Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: This is the time when students answer the question. You can have students write the claim evidence reasoning paragraph as their conclusion of the experiment. Present the question again to the students. Have the students write a claim to what they think is the answer to the question. They need to back up their claim with experimental evidence (from data table) and explain how that evidence supports the claim. If your students are new to claim, evidence, and reasoning, then you should provide sentence frames for each section.  If your students are more advanced, you can have them write a DOK 4 essay with the claim being the introduction paragraph, the evidence being the body paragraphs, and a conclusion paragraph summarizing their findings or predicting a new solution.
- Argument: Now is the time for students to try to show their mastery of what they have learned by having them argue their claim with their classmates. Socratic seminars (fishbowl) or circles are great for safely having students argue their claims or ideas with their peers.  Part of the students' grade for this section is to ask a scientific question about another group's claims, evidence, or reasoning. An example of a scientific question is for students to make a prediction based on another group's claim. An extention activity is to have student answer the prediction with more research or another experiment.
- Assessment: You can choose to use a DOK 2 and DOK 3 level multiple choice test or applied short response questions to make sure your students know all of the content. You can also choose to make the experiment itself be the assessment with you mainly evaluating the analysis, claim evidence reasoning, and argument sections. With the use of rubrics for the three sections, students will demonstrate all four DOK levels. Section 1, students use prior knowledge and analytical skills. Section 2, students use their content knowledge and experimental data to support a claim. Section 3, flush out any misconceptions when student defend their claim and get students to ask scientific questions.
Crosscutting Concepts & TransferenceThe main goal of science education is for students to transfer their knowledge to new situations. In order to promote transference in your teaching, students need to solve problems about different topics during the same lesson. What links those different topics together is a crosscutting concept. The benefit of using the crossingcutting concepts is that they discourage rote learning about one topic. Since a crossingcutting concept takes content from several disciplinary core ideas, students experience the crossingcutting concept through several different examples. By using different examples, the students need to rely on using a crosscutting concept to solve problems from different topics.  The purpose of crosscutting concepts is to help reduce shallow learning through rote learning (memorizing).
Science Practices Pedagogy
- Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering): Getting all of your students to ask scientific questions is very difficult, especially if they are not used to being asked to ask scientific questions. Student generated questions are by far the most powerful questions to base your curriculum off of. If a majority of your students are not used to asking scientific questions, then when a student asks a question, you could say "I don't know, that is a good question". Your goal after class is to now either make a one day experiment, demo, or research project based on that question. The next day you have that student repeat the question and suddenly you start a demo, start a structured inquiry lab, or start a one day research project. If you do a demo, afterwards you are going to transition this activity into building a conceptual model (explained in constructing explanations). If you do a lab, your focus will be on analyzing the data to determine the answer. If you do a research project, make sure to find grade level resources ahead of time; textbook page numbers, web addresses, etc. Your goal is to spotlight the question. Several of the NGSS standards focus on designing a solution. You can do this by creating many projects based upon solving student determined problems. For example, students will need to define an environmental problem and then they design a solution to this problem.
- Developing and using models: There are many types of models including diagrams, pictures, physical replicas, mathematical representations, concepts, analogies, & computer simulations.  All models are used to represent a system (or parts of a system) that predict phenomena. Basic models include pictures, diagrams and physical replicas. Most teachers already have students develop diagram and picture models. The carbon cycle is great example of a diagram / picture model. Higher DOK level models are usually abstract and may include mathematical representations or a concept. Concept maps are a great pre-writing assignment,  especially for EL students. Give students 5-10 main keywords that represent a concept. Students are to organize the words and link them with arrows (cross-links). The next step is critical. Have students then write connecting words on each of the arrows. The connecting words can be later used to form sentences in an essay. A conceptual model can include engineering design models but also a collection of the statements that are used to predict phenomena. Students can develop a conceptual model using teacher lead instruction. Once the conceptual model has been developed, it provides students a scaffold for linking scientific concepts to applied writing.
- Planning and carrying out investigations: The investigations practice is all about experimentation and the levels of inquiry. We advocate for the use of structural, guided and open inquiry based experiments. Planning an investigation involves guided and open inquiry and of course carrying out the investigation is included in all levels of inquiry. Confirmation inquiry is at the DOK 1  level since students already know what the end result should be. Structural inquiry is at the DOK 2  level since it mainly requires students to analyze the data to explain phenomena in terms of concepts. Guided inquiry is at the DOK 3  level as it requires students to design and conduct an investigation for a specific purpose or research question. Open inquiry is at the DOK 4  level since students need to conduct an investigation, from specifying a problem to designing and carrying out an experiment, to analyzing its data and forming a conclusion.
- Analyzing and interpreting data: One crucial skill all students need to have in order to do science is data analysis and interpretation. This includes graphing, tabulation, finding trends, patterns and relationships. For the more advanced students, they should be able to calculate the slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient for linear fits.
- Using mathematics and computational thinking: This practice is integrated with the analyzing and interpreting data practice. Students should be able to create and analyze a graph, and make and use mathematical models. A great example of a mathematical model is Mendel's Punnett squares. Graphs can also be a part of a mathematical model. All students should be able to do simple statistical analyses like ratios, rates, percentages, and unit conversions. For the more advanced students, complex statistical analysis like standard deviation, standard error and chi-square can and should be introduced.
- Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering): Make a claim and apply scientific reasoning, theory, and/or models to link evidence to the claim. Students should also be able to identify, use, and argue theories and laws in their explanations. Projects are a great tool for teachers to have their students design solutions to real world problems. Fun engineering projects include: design a solution to the water crisis for a city in California, design better lab equipment for the classroom, or design a house that reduces water, waste or energy.
- Engaging in argument from evidence: A socratic seminar is a safe and powerful way to get student to argue and support their claim with other students. The goal of the socratic seminar is to let students learn from each other and to discover how well they can support their claim. The teacher's job is to be the facilitator of the argument and not let a student dominate the discussion or go off topic. The socratic seminar safely  requires students to advance and defend their ideas while simultaneously having students evaluate competing arguments or design solutions.
- Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information: This practice is more closely aligned to the Common Core than any other practice. This is the practice where students to read and interpret scientific literature, though not at the level of scientific journals. Scientific literature can come from textbooks, science-related trade books, websites and popular articles about science.  Students should be exposed to multiple opportunities to write which include journaling, written reports, research projects and presentations.  Before students give a presentation or write a report, they should be given examples of previously written reports. This may mean you need to write a report yourself to provide as an example.
What is Inquiry?
" Questioning and reflecting lead to long lasting learning. "
Levels of Inquiry 
Confirmation inquiry is all about the old ways of teaching science. First the teacher teaches a concept and then students do a lab that demonstrates the concept. The key feature of confirmation inquiry is that students are taught the content first.
Structured inquiry requires the students to not know the answer in advanced. This means the teacher starts off with a question, and then the students follow a list of procedures to do an experiment.
Guided inquiry is when the teacher poses a question but requires the students to figure out how to test their own hypothesis. Students design their own experiment to try to answer the question. A best practice for guided inquiry is for students to do a structured inquiry lab first and then in a second lab, manipulate a new variable. AP science labs focus on Guided Inquiry and Open Inquiry. Open inquiry is like a science fair project. Students come up with the question, design how they are going to test their hypothesis, and discover the solution on their own.
" The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. "
Biology Lesson Plans
" Instructional strategies that emphasize relating new knowledge to the learner’s existing knowledge foster meaningful learning. "
The integration of students' prior knowledge, preferred learning styles, & curiosities is the most important factor when differentiating instruction for every student. Writing high school science curriculum that incorporates different learning styles, different levels of prior knowledge, student interest, and the Common Core and NGSS standards is very difficult. Students who were formerly bored with biology may once again become interested in class, with student questions and curiosity driving their learning. When students are interested in a class, they earn a better grade, which, in turn, leads to higher self-esteem and a greater feeling of success. The student-teacher relationship improves when students are successful and take an active role in participation.more
Teach to Inspire
Inspiring learning is the driving force behind everything we do. Science is the way we think about and question our world. NGSS Life Science offers life science teachers curriculums that are aligned to the Common Core (CCSS) and the NGSS.
NGSS Life Science is a high school science education resource company dedicated to inspire learning based on the Common Core and NGSS.contact us
1. Pease, C. and Bull, J. (2010) How Non-Scientists use the Scientific Method. University of Texas at Austin.
2. Kinsella, K. (2013) Brief Constructed Response Routines to Support Reluctant Writers. San Francisco State University.
3. Novak, J., Canas, A. (2008) The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.
4. Clifford, A. (2013) Teaching Restorative Practices with Classroom Circles. Orange County Department of Education.
5. Mahajan, S. (2014) Teaching Modes of Reasoning. MIT.
6. NRC Framework (2012) Science and Engineering Practices in the NGSS. Achieve Inc.
7. Webb, N. (2002) Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas. New York City Department of Education.
8. Chowning, T. (2009) Socratic Seminars in Science Class. The Science Teacher.
9. Quinn, H., Lee, O., Valdes, G. (2012) Language Demands and Opportunities in Relation to Next Generation Science Standards for ELLs. Stanford University.
10. Banchi, H. and Bell, R. (2008) The Many Levels of Inquiry. The Learning Center of the NSTA.
11. Advanced Placement Program (2011) Inquiry Instruction in the AP Science Classroom. College Board.